USA, Biden close on migrants: executive order signature to limit the requests for asylum from Mexico

USA and Biden: Tightening the Border

With a growing influx of migrants at the US-Mexico border, President Joe Biden is preparing to take executive action aimed at limiting asylum requests. According to sources familiar with the matter, an

executive order

is imminent that will seek to restrict asylum eligibility for migrants coming from Mexico and Central America. This move is a response to the surge in unaccompanied minors and families arriving at the border, which has put a significant strain on

immigration facilities

. The Biden administration has been under pressure from both sides of the aisle to address the issue, with Republicans criticizing the president for his perceived lack of action and Democrats calling for more humane treatment of migrants.

Impact on Asylum Seekers

The proposed order could impact thousands of asylum seekers, many of whom are fleeing violence and poverty in their home countries. Under current law, individuals have the right to request asylum if they reach US soil. However, the new executive order could limit this right by allowing border agents to turn away migrants at the border based on their country of origin, or by implementing a policy that requires migrants to first apply for asylum in Mexico.

Mexican Response

The Mexican government has not yet responded to the potential executive order, but it is likely that there will be pushback from both the Mexican government and advocacy groups. Some critics argue that such a policy would violate international law, while others question whether it is an effective solution to the underlying issues driving migration from Central America.

Long-Term Solutions

The Biden administration has also signaled its intention to work on long-term solutions to address the root causes of migration, including poverty, violence, and climate change. However, these efforts are likely to take time, and in the meantime, the border crisis is only expected to grow more complex.

Conclusion

The executive order on asylum seekers from Mexico represents a significant shift in US immigration policy, and its implementation could have far-reaching implications for migrants, border communities, and the Biden administration itself. The coming weeks are expected to bring more clarity on the details of the policy and how it will be received both domestically and internationally. Stay tuned for updates.

I. Introduction

Brief overview of the ongoing migrant crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border

The ongoing migrant crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border has been a contentious issue for decades, gaining significant attention once again in recent years. Thousands of migrants, primarily from Central America, continue to make the dangerous journey northwards every year, seeking asylum or better opportunities in the United States. The conditions at the border, including overcrowded facilities and prolonged detention, have raised serious human rights concerns. Migrant families are often separated, and children are held in detention centers, sometimes in inhumane conditions.

Mention of President Biden’s commitment to addressing the issue and restoring human dignity at the border

With the administration of President Joe Biden, there’s been a renewed commitment to addressing this issue. The new administration has promised to restore human dignity at the border, reverse some of the more controversial policies enacted under the previous administration, and rebuild relationships with Central American countries. President Biden’s team has expressed a desire to work collaboratively with other countries to address the root causes of migration, such as violence and poverty in Central America. The challenges are significant, but the Biden administration’s approach marks a hopeful departure from the divisive rhetoric and controversial policies of the past few years.

Background on Asylum Seekers and Current System

The current asylum system in the United States has been under immense pressure due to a significant increase in asylum requests, particularly at the U.S.-Mexico border. This situation is largely attributed to economic instability and violence in Central America, pushing individuals and families to seek refuge in the United States. Let’s delve deeper into the current system, focusing on the loopholes that have contributed to this influx.

Description of the Current Asylum System

The asylum system in the United States is designed to protect individuals who fear persecution or harm based on race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. The process typically involves an application to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), followed by an interview, and if approved, a hearing before an immigration judge. However, the system has encountered some significant challenges.

Family Unit Asylum Releases (FUARs)

One of the major loopholes in the system is the practice of Family Unit Asylum Releases (FUARs). This policy allows families who have crossed the border illegally but claim asylum to be released from detention while their cases are processed. Prior to 2014, families were usually detained together in immigration facilities. However, due to lawsuits and court rulings, the Obama administration began releasing families with notices to appear in court at a later date. This policy has been criticized for encouraging more migrants to make the dangerous journey to the United States.

Explanation of the Reasons Behind the Surge in Asylum Requests

Central America, specifically countries like Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, have been plagued by economic instability, gang violence, and other forms of crime. This has led to a surge in asylum requests from individuals and families seeking safety. The Remain in Mexico Policy, also known as “Migrant Protection Protocols,” was implemented by the Trump administration to address this issue. Under this policy, certain asylum seekers are required to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed in the United States. However, the number of asylum requests continues to rise.

Conclusion

The asylum system in the United States is facing significant challenges, with loopholes like Family Unit Asylum Releases contributing to an influx of migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border. Economic instability and violence in Central America continue to drive individuals and families to seek refuge, making it essential for policymakers to address these issues effectively.

I Biden’s Response: Executive Order to Address the Issue

President Biden, during his campaign, made promises to address the immigration and asylum crisis in a more humane and compassionate way than his predecessor. He vowed to reverse some of the most contentious policies implemented under the previous administration, such as the link (Migrant Protection Protocols or MPP). After taking office, on January 20, 2021, he signed an

Executive Order

titled “Creating a Comprehensive Regional Framework to Address the Causes of Migration, to Manage Migration Through Safe and Orderly Processes, and to Provide a Pathway for Central Americans to Apply for Protection While Temporarily in the United States.”

Summary of President Biden’s campaign promises and the Executive Order:

Biden‘s campaign promises included reinstating asylum eligibility for unaccompanied minors under the link, ending family separation at the border, and creating a more efficient and compassionate asylum process. The

Executive Order

announced on Inauguration Day focused on three main areas: (1) addressing the root causes of migration in Central America, (2) creating safe and orderly processes for immigrants to apply for protection while in the U.S., and (3) providing a pathway for Central Americans to apply for protection while temporarily in the United States.

Detailing of the Executive Order’s main provisions:

• Revoking the Remain in Mexico Policy (Migrant Protection Protocols or MPP): The order aims to terminate the policy that requires asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases are processed in the U.S. immigration courts.
• Reinstating asylum eligibility for unaccompanied minors under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA): This means that children arriving at the border without parents or guardians will be allowed to apply for asylum in the U.S., and not be returned to Mexico or their home countries.
• Establishing a task force: The order creates a new Task Force on the Root Causes of Migration to work with governments and other partners in the region to address issues such as violence, poverty, and corruption that force people to leave their homes.

Potential impact of the Executive Order on the asylum process, border security, and U.S.-Mexico relations:

Possible consequences of the Executive Order include: (1) an increase in border crossings due to the elimination of MPP, which might create a backlog at the southern U.S. border; (2) concerns over an overwhelmed immigration system and potential for longer processing times, making it challenging to accommodate the influx of asylum seekers; (3) impact on U.S.-Mexico cooperation and communication regarding border security, as Mexico may not be willing or able to handle the increased burden of processing migrants waiting for U.S. proceedings; and (4) potential diplomatic tensions between the two countries if there is a disagreement on how to manage border security and immigration policy.

Table summarizing the main provisions of the Executive Order:

	Previously	New Policy (Biden)
Unaccompanied Minors	No asylum eligibility	link
Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP)	Asylum seekers return to Mexico	Terminated
Root Causes of Migration	No comprehensive approach	New Task Force created to address causes

Reactions to the Executive Order

Responses from immigration advocacy groups:

Immigration advocacy groups have generally responded to the executive order with a mix of cautious optimism and criticism. **Positive aspects** of the order, according to these organizations, include the potential for streamlining asylum processing and providing humanitarian aid to migrants in need. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), for instance, has stated that the order’s provisions for increased screening and processing capacity at ports of entry could lead to more efficient and fair treatment of asylum seekers. Similarly, the **Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund** (MALDEF) has praised certain aspects of the order for addressing root causes of migration through economic development and security assistance to Central America.

Criticisms from conservative politicians and organizations:

Conservative politicians and organizations, on the other hand, have expressed strong concerns over the potential implications of the executive order for border security and increased illegal immigration. **Critics argue** that the order may send a message to would-be illegal immigrants that the United States is weak on border enforcement, encouraging further attempts to cross into the country. The **Federation for American Immigration Reform** (FAIR), a prominent anti-immigrant group, has condemned the order as inadequate and called for more stringent measures to deter illegal immigration. **Republican lawmakers** have also criticized the order for not going far enough in addressing border security concerns.

Reactions from Mexican officials and migrant communities in Mexico:

Mexican officials and migrant communities in Mexico have expressed a range of reactions to the executive order, with concerns over its potential implications for their countries and communities. **Mexican President** Andrés Manuel López Obrador has sought to downplay the order’s significance, stating that it will not significantly impact Mexico or its citizens. However, **migrant communities** in southern Mexico and Central America have expressed concerns over increased border security measures, which they fear could result in greater violence and instability in their regions. Some advocacy groups have also criticized the order for perpetuating harmful stereotypes about Central American migrants and failing to address the root causes of migration.

Future Developments and Ongoing Challenges

Upcoming decisions and actions from the Biden administration

The Biden administration’s approach to immigration policy, border security, and collaboration with Mexico is a topic of great interest and anticipation. With the new administration taking office, various decisions and actions are expected to unfold. These may include policy changes regarding

asylum seekers

,

border security

, and

immigration reform

. For instance, the administration might revoke some of the previous administration’s controversial immigration policies, such as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), also known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy. Additionally, they may introduce new initiatives to address root causes of migration, improve border processing, and create a more humane and efficient asylum system.

Continued monitoring of the situation at the U.S.-Mexico border

The situation at the U.S.-Mexico border continues to evolve and its impact on the asylum process and

migration patterns

is a critical issue. With large numbers of migrants arriving at the border daily, there are concerns about overcrowding at facilities, potential health risks, and delays in processing asylum claims. Additionally, the ongoing situation at the border may result in political debates and policy changes, both domestically and internationally.

Potential for further political debates, legal challenges, or policy changes

The ongoing challenges related to immigration and asylum in the U.S. and Mexico are likely to result in continued political debates, legal challenges, and policy changes. Some potential areas of contention include the role of border security, the efficiency and fairness of asylum processing, and the treatment of migrants and refugees. Additionally, there may be ongoing tensions between the U.S. and Mexico regarding border security and immigration policies. As these issues continue to unfold, it is important for stakeholders to remain informed and engaged in the ongoing discourse.

video