Iran, a bill to “promote the culture of chastity and hijab” approved by the Council of Guardians

Iran’s Council of Guardians

The Islamic Republic‘s Council of Guardians, which has the power to approve or reject legislation in Iran, has recently approved a bill aimed at “promoting the culture of chastity and hijab.” The bill, which was proposed by MP Alireza Dostdar last year, has been met with controversy both within Iran and internationally.

Key Provisions of the Bill

The bill includes several provisions that aim to strengthen enforcement of the country’s dress code, including:

• Increased fines for violators of the hijab law, which requires women to wear a headscarf in public.
• Expanded powers for the police and the morality police to enforce the dress code.
• Compulsory hijab-checks in schools, universities, and workplaces.

Reactions to the Bill

The bill has been met with widespread criticism from human rights organizations and activists, who argue that it violates women’s rights and freedoms. Some Iranian women have taken to social media to express their opposition to the bill, using the hashtag #WhiteWednesdays to protest against the dress code.

Impact on Tourism

The bill has also raised concerns about the impact on tourism, as many travelers have expressed their reluctance to visit a country where women are required to dress modestly in public. Some tourists have even reported being detained and fined for wearing clothing that is considered immodest by the Iranian authorities.

Iran’s Council of Guardians: Approving the Bill on “Promoting the Culture of Chastity and Hijab”

Iran’s Council of Guardians, also known as the Guardian Council, is a powerful

12-member body

that plays a crucial role in overseeing the legislative process and ensuring that all laws are enacted in accordance with Islamic Sharia Law. The council has the authority to veto any laws passed by the Parliament, which makes it a significant player in

Iranian politics

. Its members are appointed for six-year terms by the Supreme Leader and the Chief Justice, making it a highly influential body in the Iranian political scene.

Recently, the Council of Guardians

“approved a bill on “Promoting the Culture of Chastity and Hijab” in the Islamic Republic,”

according to Fars News Agency. This bill is aimed at further reinforcing the country’s strict dress code, which includes mandatory hijab (headscarf) for women and modest clothing for both sexes. The bill passed with a unanimous vote by the Guardian Council, despite criticism from some human rights groups who argue that it infringes on individual freedoms and contributes to an atmosphere of repression in Iran.

Background

Overview of Iran’s Dress Code Laws: The Islamic Republic of Iran’s dress code laws, specifically focusing on the wearing of hijab (headscarf) for women and modesty for both genders, have been a subject of controversy and debate for decades. These laws are deeply rooted in the country’s Islamic traditions and were implemented following the Islamic Revolution in 1979.

Historical Context:

After the revolution, Iran’s new government imposed strict dress codes for men and women as part of its efforts to promote Islamic values. For women, this meant wearing a headscarf, or hijab, in public. This rule was enforced through various mechanisms, including fines, arrests, and even lashes for repeated violations. The new dress codes were a stark contrast to the secular and modernizing trends that had been emerging in Iran prior to the revolution.

Current Laws and Enforcement Mechanisms:

The dress code laws have remained largely unchanged since their implementation in 1979. Women who do not adhere to the hijab rule can face fines, arrests, and even physical violence from vigilante groups or members of the morality police. Similarly, men are expected to dress modestly and avoid wearing tight-fitting clothing or revealing items. The enforcement mechanisms for men’s dress codes are less strict than those for women, but violations can still result in fines and public shaming.

Previous Attempts to Pass Similar Bills in the Iranian Parliament (Majlis)

Despite the controversy surrounding Iran’s dress code laws, there have been several attempts to pass similar bills in the Iranian parliament (Majlis).

Reasons for the Failure of Previous Bills:

The failure of these bills can be attributed to a number of factors. One major reason is opposition from various groups, particularly women’s rights activists and reformist parliamentarians who argue that the dress codes are a violation of personal freedom and human rights. They argue that the hijab rule is not only a matter of religious faith but also a tool used by the government to control women’s bodies and restrict their freedoms. Another reason for the failure of these bills is the political instability in Iran, which has made it difficult to pass any legislation that is not supported by a broad coalition of political forces.

Opposition from Various Groups:

Women’s rights activists and reformist parliamentarians are not the only groups opposing these bills. Many Iranians, particularly younger generations, view the dress codes as outdated and repressive. Some argue that the focus on women’s clothing is a distraction from more pressing issues, such as poverty, unemployment, and political repression. Others believe that the dress codes are a violation of personal freedom and an affront to Iran’s rich cultural heritage. Despite this opposition, the government has continued to enforce the dress codes, leading to ongoing controversy and debate.

I Content of the Bill

The recently proposed bill in Iran, known as the “Decent and Chaste Society” bill, includes several provisions aimed at enforcing stricter moral codes and enhancing penalties for violations. Below is a summary of the bill’s main points:

Stricter Enforcement of Dress Codes and Penalties:

The bill proposes harsher punishments for individuals who violate dress codes, particularly women. The penalties include fines, imprisonment, and even public shaming. These measures are intended to ensure that individuals adhere to the Islamic dress code or hijab in all public spaces.

Increased Funding for “Promoting Chastity and Hijab” Campaigns:

The bill also calls for increased funding to promote chastity and hijab in various sectors, including schools, media, and public spaces. This includes organizing campaigns, providing incentives for adhering to dress codes, and establishing penalties for non-compliance.

Measures to Prevent the Dissemination of “Immoral Content,” Including Online Censorship:

The bill includes provisions for preventing the dissemination of immoral content, particularly online. This includes censorship of websites and social media platforms that do not comply with the moral codes set forth in the bill.

Now, let’s analyze the potential impact of these provisions on different sectors and groups in Iranian society:

Women, particularly young women and those living in urban areas:

The bill’s provisions regarding dress codes and penalties for violations disproportionately impact women, especially young women and those living in urban areas. These groups have historically been at the forefront of efforts to challenge gender norms and push for greater personal freedoms. The increased penalties could lead to further marginalization and exclusion, as well as an increase in violence against women.

Religious minorities and ethnic groups:

The bill’s provisions could also have a negative impact on religious minorities and ethnic groups, as they may face additional scrutiny or discrimination for not adhering to the cultural norms set forth in the bill. This could lead to further marginalization and exclusion, as well as increased tensions between different groups.

Artists, intellectuals, and activists:

The bill’s provisions for online censorship could have a significant impact on artists, intellectuals, and activists, who rely on digital platforms to share their work and engage in political discourse. This could lead to a further narrowing of the space for free speech and expression, as well as an increase in self-censorship among these groups.

Reactions and Implications

Reactions from various stakeholders in Iran and the international community

1. Support from conservative politicians, religious leaders, and some segments of the population: The passing of the bill restricting women from attending football stadiums has received support from certain quarters in Iran. Conservatives, who have long held that women’s presence at such events could lead to moral decay and social unrest, have hailed the decision as a victory for Islamic values. Religious leaders, who wield significant influence in Iranian society, have also expressed their approval of the bill. Furthermore, some segments of the population, particularly those who adhere to traditional gender roles, view this as an affirmation of Iranian culture and morals.
2. Opposition from women’s rights groups, human rights organizations, and international bodies: The bill has been met with widespread criticism from various quarters. Women’s rights activists argue that it is a violation of their fundamental rights and freedoms, as it denies them the ability to freely attend sporting events. Human rights organizations have expressed concern over the implications for Iran’s international reputation and its commitment to upholding human rights standards. The international community, including bodies such as FIFA, have called on the Iranian government to reconsider the decision.

Future prospects of the bill, including possible challenges and amendments

The future prospects of the bill are uncertain, with several potential challenges and amendments on the horizon. The role of the judiciary and other government institutions in implementing the bill will be crucial. Previous efforts to enforce similar restrictions have faced significant resistance from civil society, particularly women’s rights activists. It remains to be seen how the Iranian authorities will respond to any protests or opposition.

Potential resistance from civil society:

There is a real possibility that women’s rights activists and other civil society groups will mount a campaign against the bill. They may use various means, including protests, social media campaigns, and international pressure, to challenge the decision. The government’s response to such resistance could have significant diplomatic repercussions.

Potential amendments:

The bill may also be subject to amendments, particularly if it faces significant opposition or criticism. For instance, there have been calls for the government to provide alternative means for women to watch football matches, such as live broadcasts on state television. The outcome of these debates will depend on the balance of power between different stakeholders in Iranian society and politics.

Conclusion

Summary of Key Points and Implications

This article has explored the complex dynamics surrounding Iran’s domestic policies on women’s rights, religious freedoms, and social conservatism. We started by discussing Iran’s controversial law requiring women to wear the hijab in public, which has sparked protests and international criticism. The article then delved into the role of religion in shaping these policies, emphasizing how Shia Islamic law influences state legislation and societal norms. Furthermore, we examined the impact on women’s lives, as they face significant restrictions in education, employment, and personal freedoms.

Reflection on Broader Context

Reflecting on the broader context, Iran’s struggle to balance women’s rights with religious and social conservatism is not unique. Many Muslim-majority countries face similar challenges. However, the specific circumstances in Iran are shaped by its revolutionary history, geopolitical location, and diplomatic isolation. The interplay between religious leaders, the government, and society further complicates efforts to reform women’s rights and expand religious freedoms.

Implications for Domestic and Foreign Policies

The ongoing tension between women’s rights, religious freedoms, and social conservatism has significant implications for Iran’s domestic and foreign policies. Domestically, continued suppression of women’s rights could exacerbate social unrest and further isolate the regime from its population. Internationally, Iran’s stance on these issues can strain its relations with Western powers and regional neighbors. As the world continues to evolve and challenge traditional norms, it remains to be seen how Iran will respond and adapt.

video